Channel 4’s ‘Considering What?’ campaign won Silver in Advertising Billboards and Gold in Advertising TVVOD Commercials at The Drum Awards, shifting public perception of the Paralympics from sympathy to sporting excellence by showcasing Paralympic athletes as elite competitors.
Channel 4’s coverage of the Paralympic Games has always served a dual purpose: to drive significant viewership and to fulfil our unique public service remit. As an organisation owned by the government but funded by advertising revenue, driving viewership of 16-34 year olds, our most valuable audience, has always been crucially important for us. Driving our share of the total and young viewing audience by 1.5% would mean exceeding that of the two previous games.
Business Objective 1: Increase Channel 4’s share of the total viewing audience and share of young viewing audience by 1.5% each during the Paralympics.
Channel 4 has a mandate to represent unheard voices, challenge with purpose, and reinvent entertainment. The Paralympics offer an intersection of all three, and the perfect opportunity to drive affinity for the brand.
Business Objective 2: Use Channel 4’s coverage of the Paralympics to drive affinity for the brand.
We also need to continue to address our ongoing objective for the Paralympics, truly making it feel like the main event in the minds of the nation.
Business Objective 3: 12% growth in people who agree with the statement “The Paralympics is as exciting as the Olympics”.
Advertisement
Context:
Initial qualitative and quantitative research revealed that audiences were primarily tuning in “to see athletes overcome their disabilities.” We quickly realised that whilst the creative work we’d done to this point was loved by the public, it had helped reinforce an attitude towards the Paralympics which was not only physically impossible (you can’t overcome an amputated limb), but to some of the athletes, deeply offensive. This was reinforced by a second phase of research with Paralympians themselves where we distilled the problem.
The Problem:
We discovered that this sentiment had become so prevalent, the athletes even had a name for it, inspiration porn. It was first coined by Stella Young in 2012, used to describe the portrayal of people with disabilities as inspirational solely, or in part, on the basis of their disability. As Hannah Dines, Rio 2026 Paralympian put it “If you say someone is inspirational after seeing them perform a physical feat in place of saying 'you are really good at what you do', you should know you could be insulting them.” Our campaign needed to challenge this head-on.
Insight:
Working collaboratively with the Paralympians, we landed on our insight. While audiences might admire Paralympians for ‘overcoming’ something, sport doesn’t. It makes no exceptions. The rules are absolute, the challenges universal.
Strategy:
This unlocked our strategy. We weren’t here to ask viewers to be inspired by a swimmer breaking a world record with one arm. We wanted them to be amazed by the record itself. We needed to shift public perception of the Paralympics from a lens of sympathy to one of sporting excellence. Our campaign would focus on elevating Paralympic athletes not as exceptions to a norm, but as elite competitors in their own right.
The campaign was briefed in the middle of the velodrome alongside Dame Sarah Storey in the same arena where she’d won gold in 2012.
The idea was simple, gravity, time and friction care nothing for disability. A tennis ball that lands one centimetre out is still one centimetre out regardless of who’s holding the racquet. Time doesn’t march on any less ruthlessly for someone with one arm. Gravity is pulling you to the ground, whether you’re in a wheelchair or not.
We articulated this idea as a question which would challenge the nation’s patronising caveats that are all too often tagged onto Paralympian’s achievements: “Considering what?”.
At every step of the creative development, we continued to consult Purple Goat, a disability focused research agency with lived experience, who helped us conduct our initial qualitative research. We used all our internal resources to make sure every execution was inclusive through audio description, subtitles and art direction across all touchpoints, from our hero film to the commercially sponsored idents.
This extended into our out-of-home executions, where we visually challenged the loaded language often used to describe Paralympians. Lines like “She’s fast for someone in a wheelchair” were physically crossed out, with striking images from Paralympic sports used to confront the audience with their own preconceptions.
Advertisement
To further challenge patronising perceptions of Paralympians, we partnered with disabled artist Florence Burns and experiential agency Fever to create a striking mural rooted in the campaign’s core idea: ‘Considering What?’. Visually bold and unapologetically direct, it extended the campaign’s message beyond screens and into the public realm.
We continued to make the Paralympics feel like a major sporting event by partnering with NewsUK and producing a 4-page pull-out promoting the 20 moments not to miss, akin to those we’re accustomed to seeing for other major sporting tournaments such as the European Championships, FIFA World Cup and the Rugby World Cup.
This mirrored the enormous scale of resources we put behind the event internally to give the games all the characteristics of a major sporting event. We drastically increased its physical availability by supporting 2 full channels, 22 live streams, available to watch any time on any device.
Delivering work of this nature required an unusually broad and sensitive stakeholder ecosystem. Beyond Channel 4’s internal teams, we collaborated with the athletes, using them as advocates when we presented the work to key stakeholders such as ParalympicsGB and the International Paralympic Committee. Their endorsement wasn’t simply a tick-box for authenticity it was foundational to creating a campaign which didn’t just please the public but represented the athlete’s experiences authentically.
Results:
Business Objective 1: Increase Channel 4’s share of the total viewing audience and share of young viewing audience by 1.5% each during the Paralympics.
Advertisement
All our commercial success is underlined by driving the viewership of our shows. Our Paris games saw a significant uplift in share of viewership for both our total and young audiences. We achieved a 22% increase on our total share of viewership from the Tokyo games, our highest share since London 2012. Our share of 16-34’s viewership was also up, achieving 34% growth from 2020, our highest ever share of young viewers, beating London 2012. This group are not only the most commercially valuable but also represent the future of Channel 4’s audience for the Paralympic Games.
Business Objective 2: Use Channel 4’s coverage of the Paralympics to drive affinity for the brand.
We ran a bespoke survey to track the brand impact amongst Chanel 4 viewers. 56% of people claimed that they had a better opinion of Channel 4 after the Paralympic Games. Crucially, this is a 23% uplift versus Tokyo 2020.
Business Objective 3: 12% growth in people who agree with the statement “The Paralympics is as exciting as the Olympics”.
Since London 2012 (64%), we’d seen a gradual decline in the number of people who agreed with the statement. Not only did we turn that around with this campaign, but we also achieved the highest ever percentage, with 79% of people agreeing that the Paralympics is as exciting as the Olympics. This represents genuine societal change and demonstrates a clear impact from our shift in strategy.
Ready to get your work recognized on a global stage? Enter The Drum Awards today. Need more inspiration? Read our Award Winning Case Studies.